Leaderboard

Seven contemporary frontier models on the full evaluation set of 200 tasks. Each task is run three times; we report avg@3 / max@3 / min@3 and within-task σ, together with per-run token and interaction cost. Higher is better.

# Model avg@3 max@3 min@3 σ Input (M) Output Tool calls Turns
1 Opus-5 0.325 0.4120.2380.098 25.6325,198316210
2 gpt-5.5 0.301 0.3880.2150.100 17.578,631333146
3 gemini-3.5-flash 0.275 0.3560.2010.083 41.2213,757243227
4 opus-4.8 0.275 0.3430.2030.075 27.0220,795228111
5 GLM 5.2 0.254 0.2990.2090.048 22.3133,285288141
6 kimi-k2.6 0.226 0.2710.1840.046 21.7120,516231166
7 deepseek-v4-pro 0.211 0.2470.1770.037 13.791,088203101

A task's run score is the fraction of weighted checks it passes (0 to 1). Input tokens count the full context read per turn; output tokens count all generation. Models were run under the same tool-calling harness at their strongest reasoning setting.

Per-domain scores (avg@3)

Difficulty is inherent to the domains: the easy-to-hard ordering is consistent across models, and no model is competent everywhere.

Domain Opus-5gpt-5.5geminiopus-4.8 GLM 5.2kimideepseek
career 0.2700.2190.2190.2430.2310.2200.193
exam preparation0.2350.2020.2560.1980.1870.1600.163
finance 0.2540.2320.2770.2080.2400.2110.204
fitness 0.3140.2760.2630.2430.1820.1730.136
litigation 0.3320.3200.2830.3210.2580.2110.230
renovation 0.4570.4150.3080.3590.3470.3340.271
rental 0.2540.1350.2230.1680.1360.0980.105
shopping 0.5110.6020.3320.4110.3860.4100.332
team building 0.2180.2140.2020.2330.1770.1050.137
travel 0.4100.3910.3910.3770.3940.3360.337

Long-horizon coherence & cost

Per-stage pass rate along the timeline
Per-stage check pass rate declines from the start to the end of a task for every model: long-horizon coherence is lost over time.
Per-run token and interaction cost
Per-run input tokens, output tokens, tool calls, and turns. Spending more does not by itself buy a higher score.